Bills, Browns, and Chiefs are for people with less imagination. I'm picking against a team coming off a short week, noontime game, with a middling defense facing a hot hot hot offense.
Great article Jimmy, but the author doesn't help his argument by including the perspective of Antonio Cromartie, who is not exactly a shoo-in for father of the year.
I'm hoping that Palko throws another trio of picks so we can start calling that feat the Tyler Palko hat trick.
ReplyDeleteDa Chiefs.
Bills, Browns, and Chiefs are for people with less imagination. I'm picking against a team coming off a short week, noontime game, with a middling defense facing a hot hot hot offense.
ReplyDeleteThat's right. PACKERS TO LOSE.
Count me as one of the 10,000 Hanie-acs.
ReplyDeleteBears trounce Oakland!!!!!
Bills to lose. And this is including the extra points I awarded Fitzpatrick for being so committed to his marriage:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/sports/football/quarterbacks-unusual-call-wearing-his-wedding-band.html
(although probably more because I also have $ riding on this game)
No Schaub, no problem in Houston. Jags to lose.
ReplyDeleteChiefs losing to the Stillers (sic)
ReplyDeleteGreat article Jimmy, but the author doesn't help his argument by including the perspective of Antonio Cromartie, who is not exactly a shoo-in for father of the year.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHe1AT-rk50&feature=related
Vikings . . . no AP, no offense.
ReplyDeletefins to lose
ReplyDeleteGiants
ReplyDeleteArian Foster turns tears into touchdowns. Jags don't stand a chance.
ReplyDeleteCleveland Browns will lose.
ReplyDeleteStan, still waiting for that hot, hot, hot offense to find the scoreboard.
ReplyDeleteStupid Keiland Williams.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Matt: Vikings.
ReplyDeleteVikings are going to lose.
ReplyDelete